Back to Squawk list
  • 18

'State of the art' air traffic control system will be unveiled in the 'next couple days,' Duffy says

Submitted
A brand-new "state of the art" air traffic control system will be unveiled by the Trump administration in the "next couple days," Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy told "Fox & Friends" Wednesday. President Donald Trump will get the "first sneak peek" before the system is presented to Congress as part of a funding request, according to Duffy. (www.foxnews.com) More...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


zolacolby
Pete Ostrowski 28
To create a brand new “state of the art” air traffic control system in less than ninety days is phenomenal. Unless there was already extensive development and testing done, I would be surprised to see something unveiled in the next couple of days.
Perhaps Mr Duffy is just alluding to an idea he has for air traffic control…
dwight666
D Chambers 3
At the bank, they kept telling us that we needed to move our software off of COBOL, and onto Apple-such platforms. Unh, a bit complex, eh? Oops, still running COBOL today. I know, let's hire Boeing to be project managers; what could possibly go wrong??

At the bank, old saying: When a software project is late, add more people. This will make it even more late! Better yet, outsource the project to India or China; at least you can save money on payroll.
joelwiley
joel wiley 3
And: The first 90% of the project takes the first 90% of the resources; the rest of the project takes the other 90% of the resources.
TimDyck
Tim Dyck 9
There was years of work put into it. I have a cousin that came out of retirement with 30 years experience as an ATC that has been involved in working the bugs out with a simulator. They are using these retired ATCs so they get experienced people without pulling ATCs out of the towers.
leiftollen
Leif Tollén 2
https://www.saab.com/sites/saab-digital-air-traffic-solutions
TimDyck
Tim Dyck 1
Thanks for the link. Some lite reading for me while I am flying North again.
ElliotCannon
Elliot Cannon 19
It will be a fantastic system. The greatest ATC system in the history of aviation. It will be a perfect system the likes of which have never been seen before. It will be completely finished and operational in 2042.
joelwiley
joel wiley 3
Greatest thing since the Cargo Cult airports in the Pacific
darjr26
darjr26 2
Yes, and Canada is going to pay for it.
TimDyck
Tim Dyck 1
Canada’s broke. We had 9 years with a Prime Minister who spent like a drunken sailor (no offense ment to any sailors reading this) on projects that have mostly been canceled. Oh and he sent $billions to other countrys that want to kill us. And now we have a PM that is even worse, so we can’t afford anything that we might actually need like a navy or Air Force…
joelwiley
joel wiley 1
so, you're not up for buying Washington, Oregon, and California and turning it into your 11th Province?
Rats.
Nooge
Nooge 4
People are saying ..Sir “They said, ‘Sir, would you mind going back? Would you mind if we didn’t stop?’ I said, ‘There’s no way. We cannot stop,’ right?”

We're gonna win so much you may even get tired of winning and you'll say please please it's too much winning we can't take it anymore.
TorstenHoff
Torsten Hoff 31
The system desperately needs to be replaced, but creating something this complex brings a great deal of risk. It's a worthwhile project, but I fear there will be many problems and delays.
BSJ
Brian Johnson 29
Musk treats his customers as beta testers. Expect little difference from this implementation.
GreggB57
Gregg Bender 18
Moving fast and breaking 5hings is not the way to go with human lives at stake.
druck13
druck13 2
There will be no need for ATC or pilots with Musk's Fully Self Flying aicraft, coming real soon now*

*This is irony, incase anyone is too stupid to realise.
Likenew
Chris Courter 1
You were a musk fanboy 2 years ago.
joelwiley
joel wiley 2
Funny how some people, when new information arrives, change their opinions based on the new info.
Others, not so much.

[This poster has been suspended.]

jeffinsydney
jeff slack -2
Dude,you know you have serious problems.
fireftr
Dale Ballok -1
Yep! They just can’t help themselves, but they really have nothing else to offer!

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

DRestrick
Sounds like Machiavelli to me: "The ends justify the means." I don't buy it!
ewrcap
ewrcap 4
Didn’t work so well for Jews or any of the people Hitler didn’t like. Also, Mussolini did not do that much for train service. Much of the improvement came from changing the reporting on delay statistics (lying). It is sad that people are willing to sacrifice their humanity and their fellow countrymen for small pecuniary gains. It is being replayed here where people are willing to accept a dictatorship in order to have cheap eggs and gasoline.
dittoheadadt
Andrew Tl 4
The use of the reductio ad Hitlerum logical fallacy renders your credibility null and void, and anything you say can be summarily dismissed. Learn to think and comment like an adult, and you'll be taken seriously. But not before.
boughbw
boughbw 0
So how do you label Hitler and Mussolini when Hitler and Mussolini appear? More to the point, I see no place where perlova has reduced anything, only you to an allegation of reduction.

[This poster has been suspended.]

[This poster has been suspended.]

[This poster has been suspended.]

[This poster has been suspended.]

[This poster has been suspended.]

[This poster has been suspended.]

[This poster has been suspended.]

larryreser
Larry Reser 0
Who doesn't?
boughbw
boughbw 6
Legit aerospace companies.

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

Propwash122
Peter Fuller 8
A new state-of-the-art ATC system is just around the corner, and always will be.
waynepa
waynepa 5
So where was all this rush when he was in office before? Every administration ignores this is issue. Now we have an accident and all the sudden it's full speed ahead. Spent 32 years in ATC and seen this song and dance before. Here is one pie in the sky project that was a money drain. Be sure to look at the pdf.


https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA210451
briansfreeman
Brian Freeman 5
NextGen was "just around the corner" 30 years ago...
babels1
Bruce Abels 4
I think the point that concerns me is the "give us all the money up front."
ctrautve
The last time the "tech bros" decided to fix ATC under the STARS program, it didn't go so well. They didn't involve the users (ATC controllers) in the planning process, so there were major human factors issues that had to be fixed, increasing costs by more than $1 billion and leading to years of delays in the STARS rollout. Maybe Duffy should try not to repeat history here? This isn't just a word processor app we're talking about—it's a complex system that has to work 100% of the time to keep aluminum from raining down on houses
TimDyck
Tim Dyck 12
If this is the project my cousin is working on then it has experienced ATCs testing it as they run senecios through a simulator. She says from her point of view it’s pretty much the same as the existing system for the ATC so there won’t be much retraining. But in the background there are major changes that take a lot of load off the ATCs so they can concentrate on what is important while the system does a lot of the mundane stuff that takes the ATCs attention away from their work. She’s came out of retirement a couple of years ago for this job so it’s must be getting close to going live.
joelwiley
joel wiley 7
If it is part of FAA NextGen then it's not a 'plan' like the release of JFK unredacted data, and something previous administrations have been working on.

I wonder how many of the players in this have been affected with the current administration's RIF across all departments

https://www.faa.gov/nextgen
fireftr
Dale Ballok 1
Why do the naysayers always dwell on what was done in the PAST, instead of looking forward into the FUTURE? Guess that’s why their glass is half-empty!
baqwas
Matha Goram 6
I understand your position, but if we don't learn from the PAST we will only repeat history? My sentiment is that if the solution was simple, then the goals would have been achieved some time back. Maybe the challenge is that the requirements (perhaps there are elements of backwards compatibility) are too broad, and a fresh perspective is needed.
ctrautve
Past is prologue. Also, I say a glass is always full—air is a liquid after all. So maybe don't assume...
Propwash122
Peter Fuller 2
…and then there’s the well-worn joke:
Optimist: the glass is half full.
Pessimist: the glass is half empty.
Engineer: the glass is twice as large as it needs to be.
dwight666
D Chambers 1
Under Stalin, the glorious Proletariat never had any half-empty glasses. They were full! There were never any lines in the shops. The shops were stocked with plentiful food. Half-empty? Impossible.
TiredTom
Tom Bruce 10
come on.... stop the political crap
Itsis80
jim sisti 17
New air traffic control system? So, does that mean every airline around the world that flies into US airspace will have to refit their flight decks with new systems to integrate with the new system too?
I believe ,more likely than not, it is pie in the sky talk. Maybe the plan is to put louder horns,rear view mirrors, and turn signals on all planes, because, well, you know, they don't have them now and cars have them, so it must be important for cars and without it planes are less safe. And the horn on planes is tiny. It needs to be the highest , the bestest horn ever heard.
paultrubits
paul trubits 4
Maybe put in a fart button like on a Tesla?
billfehring
Bill Fehring 5
Meow button for guard.
dwight666
D Chambers 2
But they will soon run out of blinker fluid. All regulatory minima and inspectors will long since be DOGEd out of action.
wcraycroft
This would be one of those huge software infrastructure projects where "you completely remodel the house while the tenants still live in it." The current ATC system must continue to meet all of its requirements until it is completely replaced. So every step of the phased rollout of new technology must not adversely affect the current ATC. Software mega-projects with these kind of restraints have a very poor record of success. In the best case, this project will go wildly over budget and implementation time. And in the worst case, the consequences are unthinkable.
joelwiley
joel wiley 1
And that is before the DOGE team of 20 year olds get in to implement cuts to reduce fraud and waste.
paulgeller1
Paul Geller 3
“Brand new” doesn’t mean it wasn’t being developed for the past two decades. Anyone can announce something as “new” when they mean “newly announced”.
cnoe
cnoe 16
Personally, it gives me comfort to know that controllers “stand in the tower and look out with binoculars”. I wouldn’t call a system “state of the art” where terminal controllers sit in a windowless building directing traffic similar to a Center facility. Even scarier is the thought of having some of President Musk’s “SpaceX engineers that are helping us”! We’ve all seen enough of his rockets explode (2 already in 2025) that I don’t have unwavering confidence in that part of this plan.

[This poster has been suspended.]

nrigg
Nigel Rigg 11
That's the whole point. Leave space engineers out of this and let aeronautical engineers figure it out.

[This poster has been suspended.]

nrigg
Nigel Rigg 4
Neither do space engineers.

[This poster has been suspended.]

nrigg
Nigel Rigg 4
How? What gives them expertise on ATC systems?
ssobol
Stefan Sobol 7
Exactly. I used to work in a large corporation who considered software engineers to be interchangeable parts. Didn't matter if the engineer knew anything about whatever the project was about, just that they were at the top of the queue of available engineers. It did not go well when dealing with specialized applications.
Rocketguy
Jay Bryon 10
What complete BS. Any time a big talker hits engineering realities, reality is going to win. Expect a lot of fanfare and then either nothing actually executed, or worse, a dysfunctional nightmare. I used to execute complex technical projects for a living, and would frequently have to rein in overenthusiastic managers with big ideas because that's just not how it works, unless a lot more work than you think is done first.
Freakyrat
Calen Chrzan 2
Some of the poster here say this system has been in development for quite some time. However look at the reality when FSS was contracted out. We had the best system in OASIS. The contractors system was a real downgrade and didn't work right and some of our guys with IT knowledge had to convince the contractor to "let us in" and fix it. We ended up with a somewhat copycat system like OASIS as the end result.
joelwiley
joel wiley 2
With a lot of revenue going to the contractor....
Consultant's creed "If you're not a part of the solution, there's good money in perpetuating the problem"
TimDyck
Tim Dyck 1
That sounds like the creed of every government and most big companies in the world.
fireftr
Dale Ballok -2
Sorry, you’re such a “Negative Ned”! Maybe someday you’ll see the sun shine through your cloudy attitude!
MichaelColucci
I don't normally comment much on this site since I'm not an aviation specialist. But I do have 30 years of experience in software development as a programmer, PM, and architect.

This is just so full of BS, it is beyond comprehension. A moderately complex gov system redesign takes a couple of years at a bare minimum and easily double that. An ATC system is magnitudes more complex than a 'moderately complex' system. It's two to three years in basic design and scoping alone. Then putting it together and marrying it to even more complex hardware systems, also being redesigned or built from scratch, is several more years. And both the hardware and software tech changes during the period.

It's even more bizarre when they he says they'll show it to Trump in the next couple days. As if Trump with a history of a limited attention span, or 95% of the population for that matter, would have a clue what they are looking at.

Along with a completely ridiculous statement about "deploying this really fast" and "Congress has to give us all the money up front".

But have no fear, they have SpaceX engineers helping out. For what, three months? Are these the same level of engineers that don't have a clue how to interpret the SSA database? This isn't just playing around with a $200M toy rocket, this puts thousands of lives at risk if it has a "rapid unscheduled disassembly".
GreggB57
Gregg Bender 8
This should be...interesting. A new ATC system designed by kids who know nothing about aviation.Glad I'm not flying anywhere soon.🙄😬
larryreser
Larry Reser 2
The thing is they know computers and AI and aided with the help of experienced controllers this is how you build a new system. Someone must explain in detail what they need and need to see on their system boards and the young techs then design a program around those given parameters.
nrigg
Nigel Rigg 2
Possibly. But the way you find out is to create a list of requirements, put it out to tender and then assess who's capability is likely to be best placed to deliver them. Obviously, this is going nowhere near a tender process so we'll get whatever these privileged people give us, regardless of how good or bad it is 🤷‍♂️
wslazyk
wslazyk 2
Are we to believe such a complex system has been thoroughly designed and reviewed in just a few weeks? No, that just doesn’t happen. At best this is a back of the envelope, napkin sketch of something that was dreamed up by whiz kids with no practical experience in the real world.

I don’t think anything will ever replaced an experienced human looking out the window with binoculars.
MichaelColucci
It's pretty amazing what whiz kids can develop with design prototyping software. You can create a real pretty dog and pony show fairly quickly.

Having it actually do something and work at five nines? Umm, not so easy.
TimDyck
Tim Dyck 2
It’s government so you gotta expect it to be a dog and pony show. And that’s any government regardless of party or ideology.
TimDyck
Tim Dyck 1
A cousin of mine is a retired ATC and she took a job a couple of years back to work on a new ATC system. I suspect this is what she has been working on. Remember in politics it is common to take credit for something that has been developed over years or even a decade or more. All politicians do this.
MichaelColucci
Yep. It was a 2022 part of Biden's infrastructure bill. $1B a year for five years for a laundry list of improvements.
tjsweeny
Tom Sweeny 2
Heard promises from this one before - will believe it when I see see it but past results suggest that we don’t hold our breath
wolph818
Bob Wolff 2
I used to be told that software problems would be addressed "in the next release" and that would happen "in two weeks". This never actually took place. Apparently such complex hardware and software issues can be fixed "in a couple of days". What are they smoking at the DOT?
w0x0f01
Kevin Cleary 2
Duffy said the key to upgrading the nation’s air traffic control system is "speed."

No, it's safety above all.
locomoco
M.F. LaBoo 2
I'm taking the bus.
MikePetro
Mike Petro 9
What bullshit. If Space-X (Musk) is involved, it will be crap, just like his Cyberjunk, and at least 90% of what comes out of this administration is straight up mendacious.
larryreser
Larry Reser 3
But somehow they are the leader in space travel, did you miss he return of the stranded astronauts.
boughbw
boughbw 5
Did you miss the string of exploding rockets? If NASA had acted with the low level of competence and disregard SpaceX is showing, they'd be shut-down and rightly so. As to how the astronauts became stranded, why don't you ask Boeing?
travistx
travistx 3
Exploding experimental spacecraft, and who else has caught multiple boosters back at the launch tower? On the other hand, the SpaceX Falcon 9 is by far the most successful launch platform available today. They've had 464 launches, with a 99.35% success rate, and are on pace to achieve 160 - 170 launches this year.
btweston
btweston 3
You know, if there are no air traffic controllers, they can’t mess anything up. The plan is perfect!
ForbesMercy
Forbes Mercy 2
So we're back to this garbage again, and we didn't even need another 9/11 to do it? I'm so tired of this Bozo telling me how I'm less free as an American every day under his nauseating "leadership". I'll listen to the State Dept advisories, not a politician who should be banned from the White House.
jkeifer3
Joe Keifer 2
We've seen this much too often! At best, what we will see is a "plan" and possibly even a "plan" to develop a "plan".

And, at the risk of sounding like a heretic, I suggest now is the time to move toward the privatization of "the delivery of air traffic services" including the controller and maintenance workforces as well as system acquisition like the rest of the world has moved to as these functions are not inherently governmental. Regulation and Safety Oversight should remain an inherently governmental function. I also think that this would be an opportunity to eliminate the unions at the same time as, from my perspective, they have no business being in the public sector.

Let the flaming begin!
rlbaldwin
Privatization like the Canadian system, eh? Fees for ATCC, approach, tower, landing & takeoff, and FBO. And don't forget about customs fee also. No thanks!
pdougmc
It will probably be new but not "state of the art." I believe it will be a system thrown together by the President's major campaign donor. You should know that his mantra is "run it until it breaks and then fix it."
Jaime1949
will they have enough personal to handle the traffic
baqwas
Matha Goram 1
Well done, POTUS. Less than 3 months in office and yet another milestone. Is RTX still in the loop?
Zot22
Bab Bezat 1
Do you suppose the SpaceX engineers designed it?
peterseerden
pete seerden 1
It's high time for the U.S. to incorporate Teleportation Technologies. Let's summon Elon for this request!
peddler3500
Won’t be trusting this
msetera
msetera -5
Hopefully developed by non-DEI real engineers.
Nooge
Nooge 0
'State of the art' air traffic control system will be unveiled in the 'next couple days,' Duffy says

Will use the money we collected from Chiner on Tariffs and the $25 Billion we got from Mexico to build the wall
gekelly3
Gerard Kelly 0
After reading all the snide political back-and-forth, all I can say is “Looks like I picked the wrong week to stop sniffing glue!” (Lloyd Bridges in “Airplane”, for those who don’t get the joke)
ElliotCannon
Elliot Cannon 0
Hughes and IBM tried it to the tune of $BILLIONS over 40 years ago and it FAILED miserably. I'm sure this one will work great... in maybe 40 more years.

Login

Don't have an account? Register now (free) for customized features, flight alerts, and more!
Did you know that FlightAware flight tracking is supported by advertising?
You can help us keep FlightAware free by allowing ads from FlightAware.com. We work hard to keep our advertising relevant and unobtrusive to create a great experience. It's quick and easy to whitelist ads on FlightAware or please consider our premium accounts.
Dismiss