All
← Back to Squawk list
Fake spare parts sold to repair CFM56 engines
"Numerous Authorised Release Certificates for parts supplied via AOG Technics have been forged," the European Union Aviation Safety Agency said ... the organization identified as the manufacturer "confirmed that they did not produce the certificate, and that they were not the originator of the part." It's unclear how many fake parts may have been installed or how many aircraft might be affected. The CFM56, the world's best-selling jet engine, is installed on… (www.detroitnews.com) More...Sort type: [Top] [Newest]
Sadly this may be (or may not be) new to the aviation industry but has been going on for decades in other industries. We have received things like lifting slings and fall arrest harness that turned out to be counterfeit. And although the article claims not to know we’re they came from if it’s like other industries it will be from our friends in China.
May be new to the CFM56, but not new to the Industry... Would love to Nail someone Gonads to the wall over this kind of things... It causes problems for everyone and have cause deaths in the past...
With the sanctions restricting the suppply of aircaft spares to Russian airlines, there is going to be an increase in demand for uncertified parts from that quarter, and envitably these will start turning up elsewhere too.
How's that for a mealy-mouthed response from the governing bodies? "The spread of undocumented or potentially faked parts into the engine supply chain is rare and treated with utmost urgency in an industry where every component requires verified provenance to ensure aircraft safety" Then why does this nonsense happen more than "rarely"?
"If a part with a falsified ARC is already installed, then it is recommended that the part be replaced with an approved part," EASA's Aug. 4 filing said, referring to the authorized release certificate which identifies the approved originator of the part. It added that the European safety agency "might take further action" as a result of the ongoing investigations.
An EASA official said Wednesday that the agency was continuing to monitor responses to determine whether any further actions were needed.
The U.K.'s CAA had no immediate comment. The FAA didn't respond to requests for comment."
Jose must be shaking in his boots and has plenty of time to hit the road if he has not already done so.
"If a part with a falsified ARC is already installed, then it is recommended that the part be replaced with an approved part," EASA's Aug. 4 filing said, referring to the authorized release certificate which identifies the approved originator of the part. It added that the European safety agency "might take further action" as a result of the ongoing investigations.
An EASA official said Wednesday that the agency was continuing to monitor responses to determine whether any further actions were needed.
The U.K.'s CAA had no immediate comment. The FAA didn't respond to requests for comment."
Jose must be shaking in his boots and has plenty of time to hit the road if he has not already done so.
It sounds to me like they may be trying to downplay the severity because they don't want to scare the traveling public. Hopefully they are absolutely nailing the parts shop to the wall with fines and documentation requests. If not, they should be, and locking up the ownership / management and throwing the key away until they get compliance.
Fake parts have been around at least as long as my A&P ticket,circa 1980. We bought stainless steel screw kits for paint upgrades from Aviall, Standard Aero. et.al. that were not only ferrous, (magnetic), but seized in the female threads because they were incorrectly threaded or oversized for the application. Everybody knew where they came from! Nobody paid for my time to get rid of that detritus. just sayin', nothin' new under el sol.