Back to Squawk list
  • 12

Boeing Warns Airlines: Battery Shipments Can Burn Hot Enough to Destroy a Plane

Submitted
 
When MH370 went missing in March of 2014, among the first details to draw scrutiny was the contents of the cargo hold: The Boeing 777, bound for Beijing, was carrying a large shipment of lithium-ion batteries. Boeing has just taken the unusual step of warning its airline customers that large shipments of the batteries—used throughout the world in cellphones, laptops, and other indispensable gadgets—could cause fires intense enough to destroy a commercial airliner. (www.popularmechanics.com) More...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


preacher1
preacher1 2
Gonna get real interesting, whether it's ever found to be a part of MH370 or not. They have already took down a UPS 747. In the absence of fireproof packaging, maybe the need to reduce shipping to a quantity that the current extinguishing systems can handle. That will probably cause a big gripe from those manufacturers but better them than pilots grumbling and/or new extinguishing systems.
avihais
Fire would never have taken out MH370. The transponders are in the front, ACARS in the Electronics bay and AES terminal in the back. There is the adjacent equipment/wiring and fire, especially intense lithium batteries compromises the aircraft structure. 9M-MRO continued on for over 7 hours with a specific flight profile and altitude changes. Someone had to have programmed the FIS and controlled the aircraft.

This is a general warning from Boeing for all carriers. I am unsure of the ignition source for used batteries. Hope my laptop doesn't ignite.
TorstenHoff
Torsten Hoff 1
MH370 was airborne for more than eight hours after the final voice transmission. It seems unlikely that it would have been able to keep aloft that long if a otherwise disabling fire had broken out in the cargo hold.
preacher1
preacher1 1
That's what has always puzzled me. I could see the 1st turn and communication going away as if a fire and all as it lined up on an alternate airport. When it went past that it was as if it was under control of somebody, so IDK.
linbb
linbb 1
I find this very strange as the RC model community has known and uses special boxes to transport and store them because of problems. Some have even brought down model planes which have no special shields for the battery's. Seems that they are a little behind times at the cost of at least one known crash.
preacher1
preacher1 2
Little behind the times is really not even close. How many years since that UPS crash over in the mid-East. Oh, I forgot, just 2 pilots, no pax on that flight.
linbb
linbb 1
Ya no pax just the cannon fodder up front can replace those with robots one day. It does get kind of tiresome reading things like this showing how far behind the eight ball they are.
sparkie624
sparkie624 1
This is not really news. A/C batteries of all types are considered Hazmat and the airline has to be a HAZMAT carrier to be able to ship them...
paultrubits
paul trubits 1
It is becoming clear that lithium-ion batteries are a Haz-Mat. It is very proactive of Boeing to send out this warning. My question is with the eight zillion regulatory agencies in existence, why isn't it coming from them? Is it on Toyota to send me a warning about transporting lithium-ion batteries in my car? If we are going to fund agencies that are supposed to be protecting us, protect us already! This is on the battery manufacturers. Proper storage and handling of any Haz-Mat is important to all of us. The stakes are too high if someone screws up.
hagela
hagela 1
The FAA has already provided guidance to airlines on this. See the following link:
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-31709198
WingletsAviation
James Hanley 1
hmmmmmmmmm.
That tis strange.
jbqwik
jbqwik 0
Anybody else beside me see the irony in this? Boeing warns about fire and explosion potential, but uses them to power the 787.
LiON are wonderful power source and perfectly fine in most applications but in a closed container are a ticking bomb; regardless of all the safety monitoring and electronics you want to tout their peculiarities are just not well understood. and etc etc
tracytearata
tracytearata 0
I did agree with this. Nobody can confirm what brought down MH370 I am sure it wouldn"t be batteries . If this was the case there would have being a mid air explosion and ignition of some source to create a fire on board. Secondly there are conspiracies of this Malaysia government who for some reason dosen"y want the plane found not do the care about the loss of lives aboard this jet. Pilot suicide may play apart of the cause. The U.S. NAVY has interests in this and has told to stay out of it as well. I bet if they started looking for it they would find it. But getting back to the story most airlines no the risk of carry such large batteries in cargo holds of jets that's why most use non passenger jets for this to be carried or air freighted. Not under the belly of a passenger jet. MAS are fully aware of this but had taken the risk on MH370

Login

Don't have an account? Register now (free) for customized features, flight alerts, and more!
Did you know that FlightAware flight tracking is supported by advertising?
You can help us keep FlightAware free by allowing ads from FlightAware.com. We work hard to keep our advertising relevant and unobtrusive to create a great experience. It's quick and easy to whitelist ads on FlightAware or please consider our premium accounts.
Dismiss